FEDERAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION:  criminal fraud, theft by deception, diversion of funds and embezzlement; RICO; mail fraud; civil conspiracy to commit fraud; mortgage fraud; obstruction of due process re Superior Court Appeal of Fulton Bank Judgment; abuse of process; unjust enrichment; discrimination; anti-trust violations

PROPABLE CAUSE:

1. Stanley J. Caterbone appeared pro se for all of these proceedings.
2. A formal letter and complaint was filed in the Lancaster County District Attorney Office to Mr. Craig Stedman on June 18, 2008; the complaint acknowledged but was never responded to by Mr. Craig Stedman or anyone in the Office of the Lancaster County District Attorney.
3. A formal complaint was filed with the Lancaster County Commissioners to President Commissioner Mr. Dennis Stuckey on September 18, 2008; again Mr. Dennis Stuckey acknowledged the complaint and promised a report and or an explanation, but never fufilled his promise.
4. Fulton Bank is a fiduciary for the Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department and the Lancaster County Clerk of Courts and holds checking accounts for both Lancaster County Departments.
5. The JUDGMENT of June 29, 2006; the SHERIFF SALE of December 20, 2006 and the DEED of February 1, 2007 all have been executed without proper jurisdiction and/or improper authority for Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
6. There are missing funds that were not accounted for and should have been paid out from the Sheriff Sale of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
7. Fulton Bank was the original Mortgage of $103,000 taken out in 1995.
8. The Lancaster County Sheriff’s Solicitor D. Patrick Zimmerman held the sale proceeds in escrow until disbursement; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
9. The outstanding balance of the Fulton Bank Mortgage of 220 Stone Hill Road was $88,568.00 at the time of foreclosure in March of 2006; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
10. The Judgment of $97,425.00 of July 31, 2006 included $3,000 for legal fees; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
11. There were no liens on the deed or real estate.
12. On June 29, 2006 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis abused is power and did not have proper jurisdiction to rule in the case no. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone); due to the fact that the Petition to Set Aside the Mortgage filed by Fulton Bank in the Stanley J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059 was under appeal in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania under Judge Anita Brody;  Case No. 1538-2006.  The appeal was not ruled upon until July 17, 2006. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis new this from the Answer to Complaint filed on May 6, 2006 by Stanley J. Caterbone.  Instead Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis committed collusion, obstruction of due process and obstruction of justice in the following ruling: “The motion is deemed unopposed for the Defendant’s failure to file a responsive brief, L.C.R.C.P. No. 1034(a)D.”  Stanley J. Caterbone refused to file a response due to these facts and was awaiting a ruling in the appeal for the Petition to Set Aside the Mortgage, case no. 1538-2006 in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
13. On July 31, 2006 Attorney Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder, LLC committed perjury and a count of unsworn falsification to authorities filed an AFFADAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129.1 with the Lancaster County Prothonotary; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).  Item No. 7. states  “Name and address of every other person of whom the plaintiff has knowledge who as any interest in the property which may be affected by the sale: Lancaster County Tax Claim Bureau; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue; Internal Revenue Service”.  The above named entities had no interest in the property, nor was Stanley J. Caterbone delinquent with any income or sales taxes at or near the time of the affidavit; nor did he have any communications with such entities prior to the statement.  The following statement was signed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., “I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge or information and belief.  I understand that false statements herein are made subject to penalties of 17 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities”.
14. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis filed an OPINION on September 5, 2006; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone), stating that “The Defendant appealed my June 29, 2006 Order granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the pleadings, and he was directed to file a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement by August 25, 2006.  He as not done so, and accordingly, I believe he has waived any appeal issues”.  The fact of the matter is that Stanley J. Caterbone had never received the ORDER from the Lancaster County Prothonotary.  This has happened on several occasions and is well documented of Stanley J. Caterbone’s mail being diverted; withheld; or not serviced at all.  All other court orders and filing requirements were met up until this time, which is highly suspect. 
15. On or about December 12, 2006 Southern Regional Police Chief John Fiorill confronted Stanley J. Caterbone during a summary appeal in the Lancaster County Courthouse and tried to persuade Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Perezous to ORDER Stanley J. Caterbone to  change his address from 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania to the Lancaster County Prison becuase the U.S.P.S Post Office in Conestoga was tired of holding his mial while illegally imprisoned at the Lancater County Prison.  This was only one week prior to the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 and was malicously attempted so that the defendants could say Stanley J. Caterbone abandoned his property.  Stanley J. Caterbone refused to change his address, and Judge Perezous would not here any further discussion of the matter. 
16. The Sheriff illegally sold the property to Central Penn Property Services of Akron, PA for $156,000 on December 20, 2006 without a certified judgment from the courts due to Pennsylvania Superior Court Appeal of the Judgment Case No. 1463 MDA 2006; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone) and due to the fact that the original JUDGMENT Ordered by Lancaster County Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis was not valid because he did not have proper jurisdiction; see Item No. 11 of this document.
17. On January 8, 2006 Stanley J. Caterbone filed an insurance claim for theft of the real estate and theft of the contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania with Harleysville Insurance Company, Claim No. MO-702274-ZS.
18. On January 30, 2006 Shawn Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC, as counsel for Fulton Bank filed a NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BEFORE BUSINESS JUDGE (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,) for a hearing scheduled on February 1, 2007 before Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James Cullen at 10:00.  The NOTICE  contained FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE. The NOTICE was served via U.S.P.S. regular mail to Stanley J. Caterbone and received on January 31, 2007 at approximately 3:30pm.
19. Item No. 21 of the FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,);  contains a perjured statement and fraud which states: “Such protections included, among other things, his opportunity to answer Fulton Bank’s Complaint and to respond to the Bank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and his unsuccessful appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court with respect to the Judgment entered in the Foreclosure Case”.  The fact of the matter is that the last docket entry up until December 20, 2006 and including January 30, 2007 is the MEMORANDUM dated October 30, 2006 which sites Pa. R.A.P. 124 & 2171 Method of Reproduction and states OTHER – We need 7 copies of this brief, also all copies need to be bound on the left like a book and if you use staples they must be covered with tape”.  Copied to Mr. Shawn Long, Esq.,  Stanley J. Caterbone never received the MEMORANDUM which was held in the Conestoga Post Office until January 4, 2007.
20.  Item No. 19 and 20 of the FULTON BANK’S RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,);  also contains perjured statements and fraud which states: “While “proper cause” is not defined for purposes of Pa. R.C.P. 3132, the terms of the rule, however, contemplate a broad discretion in the court and the court’s determination on whether to set aside the execution sale will be governed by the particular facts of the case at hand.  Goodrich Amram 2d §3125:5.  As a general rule, the power to set aside will be exercised whenever necessary to avoid injustice to an aggrieved party, such as where failure to comply with the provisions of the execution Rules results in prejudice to any party in interest.” And then Item 20 states:  The realty of this matter is that Caterbone has fully enjoyed all of the due process protections provided by the United States Constitution and Pennsylvania law throughout the Foreclosure Case, as is shown by the record.”  See this documents No.’s  9;10;14;16;17;18;19;20;21;22;23;24;25;26;27;28;29;30;31;32.
21. Furthermore all of the court cases that have claimed causes of actions dealing with any of these issues have been adjudicated with abuse of discretion, abuse of power; abuse of process; fraud; perjury; prosecutorial misconduct; judicial misconduct; and federal criminal statutes under RICO (Racketeering In Corruption Act).
22. On January 4, 2007 Stanley J. Caterbone visited the U.S.P.S. Conestoga Post Office and retrieved all the mails including the MEMORANDUM from the Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 (Appeal of the June 29^th 2006 JUDGMENT Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).; and submitted the requested copies on January 9, 2007.
23. On January 4, 2007 Mr. James D. McCullough, Deputy Prothonotary committed collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud by filing a certified ORDER of Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 Per Curiam stating “AND NOW, the fourth day of January, 2007 this matter is dismissed for failure to file a brief”; in Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 (Appeal of the June 29^th 2006 JUDGMENT Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
24. On January 4, 2007 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen committed collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud when Stanley J. Caterbone entered an oral motion for continuance of the criminal court proceedings for criminal case no. 3179-2006 in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas; in order to deal with the theft of his legal and business property, and the contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, which were at the very moment being stolen and loaded into 2 Penske trucks.  Judge James P. Cullen denied the motion and would not lend any credibility to the account for the record of the preceding.
25. Stanley J. Caterbone received a forwarded postmark of January 11, 2007 containing the January 4, 2007 ORDER to dismiss Pennsylvania Superior Court case no. 1463 MDA the Appeal of the Fulton Bank Judgment for the Foreclosure; (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271).
26. The preceding proves that at the time of the Sheriff Sale on December 20, 2006 the Judgment was not certified due to the Appeal of the Judgment in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and furthermore was still under Appeal, thus making the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 illegal; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
27. Lancaster County Court Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis committed collusion; conspiracy to commit fraud; obstruction of due process; and abuse of power by signing the ORDER dated February 1, 2007 which DENIED  the Petition to Set Aside the Sale WITH PREJUDICE without granting Stanley J. Caterbone the opportunity to state his case and submit a formal written REPLY to the Fulton Bank RESPONSE recorded on January 31, 2007; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al.,
28. Magisterial District Justice Leo Eckert, Jr., Officer Cramer of the Southern Regional Police Department, the Lancaster County Bail Supervision Office, and Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Paul K. Allison all colluded and committed conspiracy to commit fraud with the illegal detention of Stanley J. Caterbone from October 30, 2006 until after the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 until the release due to his successful Appeal on December 29, 2006.  Stanley J. Caterbone should have been released on November 1, 2006 under unsecured bail, as stated and recorded in court filings.
29. On February 1, 2007 D. Patrick Zimmerman committed collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud by distributing the proceeds of the Sheriff Sale to Fulton Bank.  D. Patrick Zimmerman also committed fraud with respect to the escrow account.
30. Stanley J. Caterbone received a check for $17,306.80 on February 2, 2007 from the proceeds of the December 20, 2006 Sheriff Sale; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
31. The 1099 from Fulton Bank to the IRS listed the fair market value at $250,000 and the property transferred for $195,000 on March 13, 2007.
32.  The deed recorded in the Lancaster County Deeds Office listed Parula Properties as the owner, when Central Penn Property Services was the rightful winning bidder on December 20, 2006; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
33. The Lancaster County Sheriff took some $5,021.57 in fees for the execution of the Sheriff Sale, yet the Prothonotary states the actual fees were only $2,676.25; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
34. Fulton Bank was paid approximately $98,000 in monthly mortgages payments during the time period of 1995 thru default in July of 2005 and received approximately $122,000.00 from the proceeds of the Sheriff Sale resulting in approximately $220,000 over 10 years on a $103,000 mortgage; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
35. During the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 the Fulton Bank Foreclosure was under appeal in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania as Case No. 1463 MDA 2006; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
36. There was never any eviction notice served upon Stanley J. Caterbone, whom had every conceivable legal right to keep possession of the property through the period of February 1, 2007 and as the Fulton Bank Mortgage Agreement outlines, an Eviction Notice would have had to have been properly served to remove Stanley J. Caterbone after February 1, 2007; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
37. All legal files of all Lancaster County Commonwealth Court; the Superior Court of Pennsylvania; the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania; the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals; local District Magistrates; all business files for the Advanced Media Group; and all personal files were also stolen from December 4, 2008 until April 13, 2007.
38. Parula Properties committed criminal trespass and burglary by illegally entering the property prior to the settlement of February 1, 2007 and removing all of the contents, including a 1991 Dodge Pick-up truck and trailer; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and Criminal Division Case No. MD 879-2007 Petition for Review).
39. All possessions were stolen and not recovered until April 13, 2007 when Harleysville Insurance demanded the return of the items and contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA   17516; Claim No. MO-702274-ZS of Harleysville Insurance Company of Moorestown, New Jersey.
40. Harleysville Insurance Company of Moorestown, New Jersey was settled under Claim No. MO-702274-ZS for stolen property that was not retrieved or returned and did so using undo influence and extortion for not including all items that were stolen or vandalized.
41. Parula Properties and or Harleysville Insurance could not account for 4 or 5 boxes of daily Time Management Calendars and large Desktop Calendars; as well as other business and legal files; and personal and business possessions.
42. Related Court Cases with Fulton Bank and Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department:
1. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas

                                                              i.      Case No. CI-06-00019

                                                             ii.      Case No. CI-06-00150

                                                           iii.      Case No. CI-06-00366

                                                          iv.      Case No. CI-06-02271

                                                            v.      Criminal Division Case No. MD 879-2007 Petition for Review

2. Superior Court of Pennsylvania

                                                              i.      Case No. 1463 MDA 2006

                                                             ii.      Case No. 951 MDA 2007

                                                           iii.      Case No. 950 MDA 2007

3. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

                                                              i.      Case No. 248 MDA 2007

                                                             ii.      Case No. 432 MT 2007

                                                           iii.      Case No. 433 MT 2007

4. U.S. Bankruptcy Court

                                                              i.      Case No. 05-23059

5. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

                                                              i.      Case No. 05-2288

                                                             ii.      Case No. 06-4650

                                                           iii.      Case No. CA-06-1538

6. U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals

                                                              i.      Case No. 07-4474

                        ii.   Case No. 07-4475

Respectfully,

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group