| |
U.S. Federal Civil Rights Law Under Section 1983 provides:
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, has generated more lawsuits than any other provision of the U.S. Constitution. Section 1 of the amendment has been the centerpiece of most of this litigation. It makes "All persons born or naturalized in the United States"citizens of the United States and citizens of the state in which they reside. This section also prohibits state governments from denying persons within their jurisdiction the PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES of U.S. citizenship, and guarantees to every such person DUE PROCESS and EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS. The Supreme Court has ruled that any state law that abridges FREEDOM OF SPEECH, freedom of religion, the right to trial by jury, the RIGHT TO COUNSEL, the right against SELF-INCRIMINATION, the right against unreasonable SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, or the right against CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS will be invalidated under section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment. This holding is called the INCORPORATION DOCTRINE.
Meeting of October 14, 2008
Location: Lancaster County Human Relations Office, 225 West King Street, Lancaster, PA 17602
Present: Stan J. Caterbone, Complaintaint
Leslie Hyson, Executive Director
Adrian Garcia, Intake Officer
Complaint: Employment Discrimination v. H&R Block for denying Enrollment Form for Tax Preparation Classes to Prepare Taxes
Incident: October 6, 2008 at H&R Block Office at Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Recorded Transcript of Meeting With Lancaster Human Relations Commission
(meeting was recorded with consent of all parties present)
[BEGIN]
[Stan J. Caterbone] Alright, so you are telling me that I did not submit a written complaint to this office before (2007)?
[Adrian Garcia] No, actually what I was telling you was that you are now visiting me to talk about the H&R Block denial of your application to teach tax preparation classes (to prepare taxes). Is that why you are here?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Correct, but you said that I did not submit a written complaint before.
[Adrian Garcia] I you that it was not in our jurisdiction.
[Stan J. Caterbone] And you never submitted that in writing?
[Adrian Garcia] I believe that we tried to contact you on a couple of occasions.
[Stan J. Caterbone] By how?
[Leslie Hyson] I know we tried to contact you by phone and by email.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I did not have a phone.
[Leslie Hyson] You set up a meeting with me and you did not show.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I know and I told you why. But the complaint was submitted before that. Mam, I submitted everything to him (Adrian Garcia) before that.
[Leslie Hyson] Correct. A formal complaint was not filed. Did you come back in and file a formal complaint?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Did you give me a complaint (form) when I was here? Then why didn’t he give me a complaint form when I was here?
[Leslie Hyson] Because Adrian told you we did not have jurisdiction.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Then why would I file a complaint?
[Leslie Hyson] That is what we are telling you, sir. Number one, Federal Law permits only ..
[Stan J. Caterbone] Don’t you have to provide that in writing?
[Leslie Hyson] No, I don’t.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Listen, Mam, let’s not continue this discussion, let’s get back to H&R Block. You seem to be talking in circles.
[Leslie Hyson] No, you’re talking in circles. Every time things don’t go your way you want to end the conversation.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Mam, you have nothing in writing to support what you are telling me.
[Leslie Hyson] We do. It tells you what is covered under our jurisdiction that is why Mr. Garcia gave you… it tells you who is covered under our jurisdiction. You gave us a CD-ROM with information but none of that is within ..
[Adrian Garcia] None of that is within our jurisdiction.
[Stan J. Caterbone] If I submit something in writing don’t you feel it is ethical for you to submit something back saying why it is not within your jurisdiction to support your conclusion?
[Adrian Garcia] We would not be treating everyone the same if we did that because we don’t do that for everyone else.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Okay, I’ll take this up with another party. Let’s talk about H&R Block.
[Adrian Garcia] H&R Block. You are filing a complaint fo discrimination and I asked you base upon what? Your first answer to me was to me was because you were a federal whistle-blower. Okay, that’s one.
[Stan J. Caterbone] One is I have a federal law suit against the City (Lancaster), the County (Lancaster), and the (Lancaster) Police; and I believe that I am being retaliated against. It could be because I’m Italian decent. It could be because of all of the lies and slanderous rumors about me in this (Lancaster) county. I have three (3) false imprisonments. Do you know what 30 false arrests are? I was arrested 30 times and the charges were dismissed. I was in prison 60 days for nothing – 60 days for nothing.
[Adrian Garcia] Okay. So you think…
[Stan J. Caterbone] Let me finish. I was in prison 60 days because someone lid in the county (Lancaster County Bail Supervision Office) and said I did not attend a bail supervision meeting – an intake meeting. I went to court the second day they took me into prison. They proved I DID attend but they changed the bail bond (from unsecured to secured, and I was released some 60 days later after winning my own appeal of the bail bond decision by Judge Paul K. Allison)
[Adrian Garcia] So one of your allegations is because of the record of the contacts you have with police during the occasions, that is what you believe is denying you an application?
[Stan J. Caterbone] I said whistle-blowing.
[Adrian Garcia] Mr. Caterbone follow what I am saying. This is a give and take conversation; we won’t both talk at the same time. Let me regurgitate what you are telling me. What you are telling me number one is the whistle blowers act. If you read our brochure that one is not covered. So we’ll put that on aside. Your second one is again the county (Lancaster) and several other agencies and you said it was retaliatory. If you look here (pointing to brochure) this agency does have a provision for retaliation – it is a complaint against this office, not a complaint you may have with other agencies. That’s your second allegation. Your third allegation you begin by saying that it may be because you are of Italian decent. But you went in and asked for an application, correct?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Yes.
[Adrian Garcia] Did other people go in and ask for an application with you?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Was I accompanied by someone?
[Adrian Garcia] Were other people in there for the same purposes?
[Stan J. Caterbone] No.
[Adrian Garcia] So, another words we have no one to compare and contrast.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Yes you do. You have the brochure (H&R Block Tax Preparation Brochure) that says they have to (provide enrollment form). That is their policy, sir.
[Adrian Garcia] I understand that. That is not my question.
[Stan J. Caterbone] That is their policy, sir. Do I have any - are you asking me for a witness?
[Adrian Garcia] Well, everyone that come into this office because what you are hinting at here is public accommodation, but the problem with public accommodation is that when you are going into an area you already..
[Stan J. Caterbone] I’m not filling out an application, I’m trying to ge an application for enrollment into the tax preparation class which the policy state they provide for everyone. They even have a discrimination clause in here (H&R Block Tax Preparation Brochure). If you would read it, you would see that. Apparently, they are treating me different.
[Adrian Garcia] And I am trying to get to why.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I just gave you five (5) reasons.
[Adrian Garcia] I already eliminated one and I’m about to eliminate the second one.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Well, what would be covered?
[Adrian Garcia] Someone has to live in Lancaster County, National Origin. Why do you think it is National Origin?
[Leslie Hyson] Sir, I’m asking you because you were there.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Because Italians have a history. Do you know how many Italians…
[Leslie Hyson] I’m not arguing with you.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I know, I’m giving you the answer. Do you know how many Italians work in this county (Lancaster)? Do you know back in the well, 20’s we were the minority to the Irish and to the Germans. We went through this. That’s why. Name the first Italian President (of the United States).
[Leslie Hyson] I don’t know.
[Stan J. Caterbone] There were none. Never!
[Adrian Garcia] So, you’re saying it could be because your Italian. Has she said to you in the denial of the application anything as…
[Stan J. Caterbone] Yes. First of all she failed to give me an 800 number, which they have. She gave me a ticket, a yellow memo pad that said “Sheryl” and a 569 number.
[Adrian Garcia] Okay.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I think that is deception. I mean..
[Adrian Garcia] Did you call the number?
[Stan J. Caterbone] No.
[Adrian Garcia] Why didn’t you call the number?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Because they were obligated to give me an application (enrollment form) there. I did not go in there to apply, I went to get an enrollment form. It says here (H&R Block Tax Preparation Brochure) “To enroll simply contact your local H&R Block Office by telephone, mail, or in person”. I went in person. They refused to enroll me.
[Adrian Garcia] Any you believe it is because you are Italian?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Part of it, yes. Yea, I’ve been in this county (Lancaster) for 2 or 3 years submitting applications – not one person would give me an interview. I’m talking about from Turkey Hill to brokerage (financial services) firms. Did you ever read my resume?
[Adrian Garcia] Yes.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Do you know what my qualifications are?
[Stan J. Caterbone] Well, maybe you should refresh your memory and go back to my website. Do you know I’m pro se? I represent myself in the courts.
[Adrian Garcia] I remember seeing it.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Do you know I just won (an appeal overturning lower U.S. District Court ORDER to dismiss two (2) civil actions) in the Third Circuit (U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals)? Do you know I beat Fulton Bank, Lancaster County ….
[Adrian Garcia] I know you have a pretty extensive list.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Do you know who I blew the whistle on?
[Adrian Garcia] I can’t remember. I can’t remember the details.
[Stan J. Caterbone] Listen. I blew the whistle on ISC. I was the one that blew the whistle. ISC, the Lancaster County Corporation. They were selling arms to Iraq. Do you understand that?
[Adrian Garcia] Okay, let’s stick to the matter at hand.
[Stan J. Caterbone] They were indicted four (4) years after I blew the whistle on them.
[Adrian Garcia] I gave you.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I don’t know why you’re sitting there laughing at me!
[Adrian Garcia] I gave you… That’s deceiving. I’m not laughing at you.
[Stan J. Caterbone] You were!
[Adrian Garcia] What I want to know is what did she say that makes you believe that it is because you are of Italian heritage that she is denying you the application?
[Stan J. Caterbone] The fact that she denied (giving) it.
[Adrian Garcia] Did you see anyone else go in and ask for an application that was Italian?
[Stan J. Caterbone] No, I did not see anyone go in there.
[Adrian Garcia] So, in other words there is no one that I can compare and contrast to? If you came in here and said I went in and asked for an application and a person came in as I was leaving and asked for an application and they got it…
[Stan J. Caterbone] They have to provide the application, sir.
[Adrian Garcia] That is not what it says here. My job is to enforce what it says here. My job is to ….
[Stan J. Caterbone] Your job is to abide by the statute regarding discrimination and take my complaint.
[Adrian Garcia] Order 64. That is the only thing this office can deal with. But so far your not meeting the burden for us to even open up a case.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I don’t understand why I am not meeting the burden.
[Adrian Garcia] Well, you’re not giving me anything that falls …
[Stan J. Caterbone] Is that your personal opinion? It is discretionary?
[Adrian Garcia] No, I think you are here …
[Stan J. Caterbone] Isn’t it?
[Adrian Garcia] No.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I think it is your discretionary opinion. So if I find a case that contradicts you, then what are you going to do?
[Adrian Garcia] Say Congratulations.
[Stan J. Caterbone] I’ll go do that. I won’t waste your time anymore. Thank you very much.
[Adrian Garcia] Your welcome. (Turn Digital Recorder Off and Leave Office)
[THE END]
August 27, 2007
Adrian Garcia Intake Officer Lancaster County Human Rights Commission 225 West King Street P.O. Box 83480 Lancaster, PA 17602
Re: Discrimination Complaint
Dear Mr. Garcia:
Enclosed is the documentation to support a discrimination complaint according to Ordinance #64, and its mandate which states “WHEREAS, the County of Lancaster has fostered the cause of those civil rights protected by state and federal law by providing for a Lancaster City-County Human Relations Commission, as set forth in Resolution No. 45 of 1964”.
I am alleging discrimination according to:
1. Section 7: Racial or Ethnic Problems 2. Section 8: Employment Problems 3. Section 11: Unlawful Public Accommodation Practices 4. Unpopular Political Views 5. Retaliation for Whistleblowers due to Federal False Claims Act regarding International Signal & Control, Plc.,
Most of these activities cover a period of 20 years, and are continuing today. Please note that a Civil Rights Complaint was filed in Pennsylvania Civil Rights Section on July 21, 2006, and an amended Employment Discrimination complaint was filed on February 8, 2007. More information is available on the website of Advanced Media Group, http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/.
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group Enclosure
February 8, 2007
Nelson Brewster Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office Civil Rights Enforcement Section 14th Floor Strawberry Square Harrisburg. PA 17120
RE: Complaint received in the Civil Rights Enforcement Section (CRES) on July 21,2006
Dear Mr. Brewster:
In addition to the Complaint that you had received on July 21, 2006, I would like to add the following Employment related complaints regarding discrimination, and other causes of actions regarding my Civil Rights
1. Attached are several applications for employment, my resume, and several communications via email soliciting employment with potential opportunities for employment. As you can see, I have applied for employment at a wide variety of companies, including the City of Lancaster and the County of Lancaster. All of these applications occurred from approximately October of 2006 and this date. I am alleging that due to the fact that I would have accepted any position, even that of a clerk at both Turkey Hill and McDonalds, I have been subject to a vast array of discrimination towards a Whistle Blower2, and discrimination3 for my political views and beliefs.
1 §1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: “The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from federal interference”, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241, 242; U.S.C.A. – Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, § 2: 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
2 In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following: “Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment and it’s proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan”. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
3 §1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: “The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from federal interference”, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241, 242; U.S.C.A. – Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, § 2: 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
I was denied an application at McDonalds on the Millersville Pike on more than 4 occasions, and was only allowed to submit an Employment Interest Form. This all occurred over the last 45 days. I was also denied interviews at all places of employment. I had submitted resumes to several of the more professional employers.
There is no excuse for this behavior given the fact that I have never failed at any business endeavor in my life. My professional accomplishments are truthful and honest and I challenge you or anyone to find otherwise.
I hope to hear from you in the very near future. I appreciate your help regarding these serious allegations.
Respectfully, Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group
Cc: file enclosure
AMENDED COMPLAINT Filed in July of 2006
PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL Tom Corbett, Attorney General COMPLAINT FORM
Civil Rights Enforcement 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 (717) 787-0822 Fax: 787-1180
2. IF EMPLOYMENT RELATED, WHOM IN MANAGEMENT HAVE YOU INFORMED OF YOUR COMPLAINT? DAVID PFLUMM; PFLUMM CONTRACTORS, INC., FEBRUARY OF 1998WHAT ACTION WAS TAKEN?NONE3. DO YOU KNOW OF ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL (S) WHO HAS BEEN TREATED THE SAME OR RECEIVED SIMILAR TREATMENT?NOWHAT HAPPENED TO THESE INDIVIDUALS?4. DO YOU HAVE ANY WITNESSES TO VERIFY OR CONFIRM YOUR COMPLAINT?YES5. DID YOU SUFFER ANY MONETARY LOSS OR LOSS OF BENEFITS? PLEASE EXPLAINYES VARIOUS BUSINESS INTERESTS –
1. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP,LTD., AND ALL RELATED OPPORTUNITIES 1987 a. FMG ADVISORY,LTD. REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISORb. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP,LTD., STOCK AND OPTIONS AND FRANCHISING OPPORTUNITIES c. MORTGAGE BANKING OPERATIONS d. VENTURE CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES e. AVIATION CHARTER BUSINESS AND OPPORTUNITIES 2. POWER PRODUCTIONS I – DIGITAL MOVIE JOINT VENTURE WITH a. POWER STATION STUDIOS b. TONY BONJIOVI 1987 c. FLATBUSH FILMS 3. ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD., a. STOCK VALUE b. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES BUSINESS AND OPPORTUNITIES c. JOINT VENTURE OPPORTUNITIES WITH i. AMERICAN HELIX CORPORATION ii. HIGH INDUSTRIES AND AFFILIATED HIGH COMPANIES iii. AIM INVESTMENTS AND INVESCO iv. EXCELSIOR PLACE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR DOWNTOWN LANCASTER AND MEEDER GROUP v. DONNELLY GEO SYSTEMS, LANCASTER,PA vi. GAMILLION FILM STUDIOS OF HOLLYWOOD CALIFORNIA vii. INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS OF HOUSTON TEXAS viii. PLANNERS SECURITIES GROUP, INC. OF ATLANTA, GA ix. BENNET WILLIAMS REAL ESTATE OF YORK, PA x. BECKY AUSTIN OF HOLLYWOOD, CA; MORTGAGE BANKER xi. MARCY SILEN AND FLATBUSH FILMS OF HOLLYWOOD, CA xii. SKIP LANGLEY AND EESCOMP OF HARRISBURG, PA xiii. NETTWERK MUSIC GROUP BEVERLY HILLS, CA4. PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS – a. NOVEMBER OF 1987 b. APRIL OF 1998 5. PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING AND FINANCE AGENCY – a. EMERGENCY MORTGAGE FUNDS, NOVEMBER OF 198 b. EMERGENCY MORTGAGE FUNDS , FEBRARY OF 2006 6. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE a. FOOD STAMPS AND CASH ASSITANCE; May 2005 b. FOOD STAMPS AND CASH ASSITANCE; June 20067. PROVIDE THE DATE(S) OF INCIDENT(S): QUESTIONS CONTINUED ON PAGES #70THE FOLLOWING ARE INCIDENTS AND ACCOUNTS TAKEN FROM OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR LEGAL PURPOSES. FOR TIME AND CONVENIENCE DUE TO THE LIGITATION SCHEDULE OF THE COMPLAINTANT, SOME OF THE INCIDENTS MAY NOT BE GERMAIN TO THIS COMPLAINT AND SHOULD BE IGNORED. PLEASE ACCEPT OUR APOLOGIES FOR ANY ERRORS IN EDITING AND FORMATING. ALL COMMUNICATIONS INCLUDING LETTERS, FACSIMILES AND EMAILS ARE IN ITALICS.LIST OF ALLEGED ASSAILANTS AND PERPETRATORSConestoga Police Department and Southern Regional Police Department; Chief Fiorill, Sgt. Robert Busser, Officer M. Fedor, Officer Rob BergerPflumm Contractors, Inc., and employees, Millersville, PAThomas Grassell, Conestoga, PAWagon Wheel Restaurant, Conestoga, PAResidents of Conestoga, PA (Mr. and Mrs. Tim Decker, residents Stone Hill Road)Lancaster County District Attorney, Lancaster, PALancaster County Public Defender Office, Lancaster, PAMannheim Township Police DepartmentThe Alley Kat Restaurant, Lancaster, PAYolanda M. Caterbone, Lancaster, PA Steven P. Caterbone, Miami, FloridaMichael T. Caterbone, Ft. Lauderdale, FloridaPhillip W. Caterbone, Austin, TexasCommonwealth National Bank (Melon Bank), Pittsburg, PAFulton Bank, Lancaster, PAFarmers First Bank, Pete Richter, Lancaster, PABank of Lancaster County, Lancaster, PASovereign Bank, Millersville, PACitizens Bank, Lancaster, PASt. Joseph Hospital, Regional Medical Center, Lancaster, PALancaster General Hospital, Dr. Emily Pressly, Dr. Bill, Employees and staff, Lancaster, PAFinancial Management Group, Ltd., et al, Lancaster, PAAttilio M. Grossi, Lancaster, PAFebruary 20, 2005 – Letter to the Editor After finding my cat killed and left by my pond:“While I was away for a family emergency, I had someone let my two cats out after being inside for a few days, which I have always done in the past. I returned after being in South Florida for one week. Upon driving toward my driveway, my one cat was anxiously awaiting my arriveal. However, my second cat was not there. This was immediate cause for concern, since being mother and son, they had always stuck together. After a few days I knew that my cat was either abducted or was harmed. No way would he be around and not come home.The other evening I went over to my suspect neighbors home, whom I know often has been mischevious toward my property in the past, and asked him if he saw my cat. He went on to tell me how big my cat is and how he is the "king of the neighborhood". I found this conversation to be typical bull.... He said "don't worry it will show up soon!"Last evening I found my dead cat lying by my pond with a possom chewing on its ear. I examined the body and found that it's neck had been broken with no other signs of any other wounds.I called the Humane Shelter and talked to a Cruelty Officer who said" There is nothing we can do if you did not see anyone phycically harm the animal"Is this the way it is? You have to prove a crime before they will investigate? Sounds alittle backwards to me, but then again I ofter forget where I am at.”March 7, 2005 – Email to Dan Berger, formerly of Fiancial Management Group, Ltd., and brother-in-law of Honorable Lawrence Stengel, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvanai;Advanced Media GroupFrom: amgroup01@msn.comSent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:53 PMTo: danielberger@comcast.netSubject: ConversationOK, Danny, attached is the document that I had promised. As far at the other issues concerning the Middle East, here it goes. The following is a communication that was specifically for the "intelligence community". As you probably are aware, there are some 15 or more agencies that comprise that part of our government. The following paragraph was never saved as a file, the only way to authenticate the document would be to perform a forensic autopsy on the hard drive to which it was written. The document was displayed on my screen for several days. I had written the communication sometime on or around January 1, 2005. I apologize for not knowing the exact date, but I never really had any reason to resurrect it before now. By memory, the following is the communication: "We finally have an opportunity for real peace in the Middle East, and you continue to play your childish games with me. Stop collecting a paycheck and go and support our president and troops. Your efforts would be far better served. THE PEOPLE OF THIS WORLD DESERVE PEACE AND NOTHING LESS" Remember the timeline of events. The Presidential Inauguration was on January 20, and the Iraq elections on January 21. I went on to expand upon that communication and told Chris Mathews during a debate (no evidence thereof) that "It is about people, not governments" hence the Inaugural speech!There, it is what it is???????”Commins HearingPhillips OfficeFebruary 2, 2005 – Phillips Office Supply, Lancaster, PA email;Advanced Media GroupFrom: amgroup01@msn.comSent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:11 PMTo: cmailbox@buyphillips.comSubject: RE: Repair Service CenterJust wondering why it takes you 8-10 days to receive whatever it is that you are waiting for when I can receive anything I want within 2-3 day! Just curious. I'll take any necessary action that is within my power and rights to provide a fair and reasonable conclusion to your attempts to humiliate and degrade me. Do you Understand!
----Original Message Follows----From: "comments" To: "Stan Caterbone" Subject: RE: Repair Service CenterDate: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:37:14 –0500Mr. Caterbone - I have researched your issue and spoke with Mr. Leonard Brown who is the Director of our Technology Service. He indicated that he talked with you last week and indicated that your issue would be resolved within 8-10 days. He explained the circumstances and informed me that you were satisfied with the resolution. Please e-mail comments@buyphillips.com if this is incorrect and require me to look into this further.Thank you.
-----Original Message-----From: Stan Caterbone [mailto:amgroup01@msn.com]Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:53 AMTo: commentsSubject: Repair Service CenterAnd where is my facsimile machine guys? Serial Number 372122034, Sharp ux-b700. Let me see if I got this right. I dropped it off with an authorization from Sharp, the manufacturer, case no. 2214140, and you still have not repaired that machine? You had the machine how long now??? I would say about 3 weeks or longer. You know the emotional stress and duress that this causes me is about enough to constitute a very fruitful legal engagement. And especially considering that you are conducting your activities with malice.Weis Markets July 4 2006Fiorill SRPD LawsuitSenator SpecterLancaster County In Forma Pauperis DenialsPennsylvania Housing Finance Fabricated StatementLos CabosHamilton Hearing Frisking, etcLancaster City Police Littering; fabricated stop sign arrest;Citizens Bank ExtortionJuly 2, 1987 - In an effort to continue all efforts and business activities, Stan Caterbone visits the Office Works, owned and operated by High Industries, to purchase a printer while staying in Stone Harbor. FMG, Ltd., had an open account, which Stan Caterbone authorized, as an officer of FMG, Ltd.,. The Office Works demands cash payment and refuses to put the purchase on credit.July 6, 1987 - In an effort to document the conspiracy theory, Stan Caterbone requests Tom Caterbone to call Robert Kauffman to inquire about the status of his affairs, and to tape the conversation. Tom Caterbone identifies himself as John Green, a client of Stan Caterbone's and Robert Kauffman states the following: "Stan Caterbone has moved his office to Stone Harbor, NJ.. he is not taking care of business, and I need to see to it that his clients are taken care of for the time being.. he has been spending a lot of money, an airplane, a place at the shore, and he seems to think that he is too important for his traditional clientele.. There is some history of mental disorders in his family history.. I can't come right out and say that that is what's going on, .. I wish Stan would get some professional help.. However for the time being, Stan is not taking care of business, and I need to be concerned for his clients.”July 6, 1987 - Stan Caterbone telephones Dr. Al Schulz, psychiatrist at St. Joseph Hospital, and client of Stan Caterbone's in order to thwart the allegations of insanity. Dr. Al Shulz had disclosed that several persons, including Mary Lynn Dipaolo and Jere Sullivan had called him concerning Stan Caterbone's behavior and activities. From the allegations, Dr. Shulz advised that Stan Caterbone was suffering from illusions of grandeur, and prescribed Lithium treatment, and to return to Lancaster for consultation. Stan Caterbone insisted that the allegations were purely fabricated, and that no one had any legal right to interfere with his business and or legal affairs, let alone his confidential medical records.July 6, 1987 - Stan Caterbone contacts David Drubner, of Boston, Ma, a friend of Stan Caterbone's brother’s Mike, and an attorney. During the conversation, David Drubner questions Stan Caterbone about "taking some medication", and supports the allegations of insanity.July 6, 1987 - In the following days, Stan Caterbone had made numerous telephone calls to local, state, and federal authorities, for intervention and help regarding all of the preceding events and circumstances. The following is a brief description of each: Manheim Township Police Department, responded "what bank branch repossessed your aircraft"; Pennsylvania State Senator Gib Armstrong, responded, "I will call the Pa Attorney General's Office and have them call you; the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Philadelphia-based field office; U.S. Representative Robert Walker (RPa), a detailed and explicit conversation with Mrs. Robert Walker, who would only advise Stan Caterbone to put his situation in writing and submit it to the Congressman in his Washington, D. C. office. In addition: David Wouls (Executive Vice President of the Lancaster chamber of Commerce & Industry), Stan Caterbone talked at length, and in detail, making allegations of misconduct with members of the same; National Association of securities Dealers (NASD), in Washington, D.C., Stan Caterbone discussed the securities related violations. And also: the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), also in Washington, D.C., and discussed securities laws violations; the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, of Harrisburg, Pa, discussed the implications of Stan Caterbone's illegal lockout, and his legal and formal positions, including incorporating officer of FMG, Ltd., Stan Caterbone received no support or follow-up communications concerning all of the above requests, despite his apparent emotional duress, and extreme situation.July 8, 1987 - A formal notification of the termination of Stan Caterbone's Registered Representative Securities license with the Planners Securities Group Inc., of Atlanta, GA is received, with a "cc: Robert Kauffman".July 8, 1987 - Stan Caterbone's brothers, Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited at the residence of Stan Caterbone's in Stone Harbor, NJ, and refuse to leave until Stan Caterbone agrees to take Lithium and return to Lancaster to undergo treatment by Dr. Al Schulz, for mental illness.July 16, 1987 - Stan Caterbone travels to New York, from Boston, MA, to visit with Bob Walters of Power Station Studios, to discuss the allegations of Blackmail, and to find out who is involved, including Scott Robertson and Power Station Studios. Stan Caterbone discusses the illegal repossession and other related matters, however during the conversation, becomes suspicious when Bob Walters and Tony Bongiovi disclose that the "Digital" Movie project is suddenly suspended until a later time.July 17, 1987 - Stan Caterbone travels to Hollywood, California to meet and visit with Ted Gamillion and Gamillion Studios (Film Studio), and Marcia Silen of Flatbush Films. Ted Gamillion had previously solicited the consulting of Stan Caterbone in order to help reorganize the financing of the film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina had gone sour. Stan Caterbone had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted Gamillion agreed to allow Stan Caterbone to represent the studio in order to secure the required financing. Ted Gamillion provided Stan Caterbone with substantial amounts of confidential financial, legal, and tax documents for the project. During the visit, Marcia Silen had disclosed to Stan Caterbone that Scott Robertson had made allegations of insanity about him (Stan Caterbone) to persons at Power Station Studios and at Flatbush Films.July 24, 1987 - Michael M. Hartlett sends a letter to all creditors of FMG, Ltd., informing them that stated the following: “Stan Caterbone is no longer an officer of the corporation; he was removed from office on July 1, 1987; he had been purchasing items under FMG, Ltd., and obtaining corporate discount and rates; and formally notifying them that Stan Caterbone had never had the right to purchase items through FMG, Ltd., or make corporate commitments on behalf of FMG, Ltd., or contract or in any way obligate FMG, Ltd.,.”July 30, 1987 - Stan Caterbone had paid $600 to Dr. Levine, a Psychiatrist from North field, New Jersey, for an objective evaluation of his mental state of mind, in order to prove the fabricated allegations of 'insanity". Dr. Levine had conducted a 2 hour meeting in his residence in Stone Harbor, NJ, and required Stan Caterbone complete the Minneapolis Multiphase Personality Inventory (MMPI). Stan Caterbone completed the test, immediately returned it to Dr. Levine. After several weeks without any communications from Dr. Levine, Stan Caterbone had called for the results. Dr. Levine had explained that he had conducted telephone interviews with members of Stan Caterbone's without notice or consent to the original request of Stan Caterbone to conduct an objective and confidential examination. In addition, Dr. Levine prescribed Lithium drug therapy, and disclosed a diagnosis of Bi-Polar Mood Disorder without providing any reports concerning a study or evaluation of his behavior or present state of mind. He only used the explanation of others contacted by telephone.August 6, 1987 - The legal firm of Appel, Yost & Sorentino, of Lancaster, Pa., send a formal notice to Stan Caterbone, demanding the return of a facsimile machine leased from the ACM company of Lancaster, Pa. Attorney Appel advises Stan Caterbone that it is the property of FMG, Ltd., and should be returned at once or legal action will follow.August 8, 1987 - John M. Wolf, Executive Vice President of Commonwealth National Bank sends Stan Caterbone a formal letter advising that the repossession of July 2, 1987 was both lawful and appropriate, and declines to accept a settlement of $5 million for lender liability violations.August 10, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives a facsimile from the Board of Directors of FMG, Ltd., signed by Robert Long threatening to file criminal charges for "embezzlement (we have checks to prove it), burglary, employee theft, corporate opportunity and slander against our firm".August 12, 1987 - Yolanda Caterbone, mother of Stan Caterbone, Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom Caterbone, all brothers, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited to the residence of Stan Caterbone in Stone Harbor. After several requests for the visitors to leave the premises are denied, several brothers refuse to let Stan Caterbone leave the premises. Stan Caterbone flees, and the brothers chase after him. Stan Caterbone runs into a neighbors house to ask to use the telephone to phone the police. However, after realizing that he is scaring the occupants, he flees to the Stone Harbor Police Department, a few blocks away, in an effort to obtain a restraining order and to lawfully have the unwanted persons vacate his residence and personal property. Officer Steve Conners and Officer Henry Stanford refuse the request, and hold Stan Caterbone in custody. After some 30 minutes, the officers, accompanied by Steve and Tom Caterbone, place Stan Caterbone into a Police Cruiser and proceed to the Burdette Tomlin Hospital, in Stone Harbor. Upon arriving, Stan Caterbone is interrogated and questioned extensively about a "gun". A hospital staffer then accuses Stan Caterbone of an attempted suicide (fabricated allegation from a phone call from James Warner of Lancaster, PA; which is later found in the hospital report) and keeps him in custody for 4 or more hours. Another hospital staffer performs an extensive mental health evaluation. Stan Caterbone is given an ultimatum of signing a contract in order to be released form the hospital, the contract stated: "I Stanley J. Caterbone will not take my life tonight or at anytime".August 14, 1987 - The same family members again arrive unwanted at the residence of Stan Caterbone in Stone Harbor, NJ. After another confrontation, similar to the incident of two evenings before, Stan Caterbone fleas to the Avalon Police Department for another attempt to get a restraining order. However, en route, just a few blocks from the Avalon Police Station, an Avalon Police cruiser pulls Stan Caterbone over and arrests him for the following violations:1. Driving Beyond the speed limit.2. Driving an unregistered vehicle (all required registration materials were in Lancaster, PA)3. Containing an empty beer can in his vehicle (which was at .1 east three days old)In addition, the Avalon Police Department repossessed his car and locked it in the Avalon Police Department Compound, which was his only means of transportation and communication by car phone. They also accused him of having controlled substances, which were over the counter muscle relaxers for his back pain.August 24, 1987 - Robert Kauffman sends a letter to Millard Johnson, Stan Caterbone's client, regarding his previous intentions of paying the $25,000 demand note of Stan Caterbone to Millard Johnson. Robert Kauffman had previously promised to pay the debt to Millard Johnson during a meeting. Robert Kauffman, told Millard Johnson to contact the FMG, LTD., attorney, Craig Russell in order to file legal claim, and formally disclosed that he would: “ no longer handle any discussions concerning Stanley J. Caterbone. “ In the last paragraph, Robert Kauffman discloses that "attorney Mr. Patterson, no longer represents the Caterbone family regarding his pending bankruptcy or guardianship". Notes: Stan Caterbone never gave any legal jurisdiction or rights to any family member, has never filed for bankruptcy, was not bankrupt, or even knew of an attorney named Mr. Patterson.September 3, 1987 - Robert Kauffman calls detective Larry Sigler or the Manheim Township Police Department to report an alleged Terroristic threat made two days prior, on September 1, 1987, by Stan Caterbone between the hours of 9:00 and 1 pm noontime. Detective Larry Sigler issues a warrant for the arrest of Stan Caterbone with District Justice Murray Horton that was issued at about the same time as the arrival of Stan Caterbone at Romar Aviation. At approximately 3:00 pm Mary Lynn Dipaolo picks Stan Caterbone up at Romar Aviation for a scheduled visit and dinner. After Stan Caterbone becomes annoyed at Mary Lynn Dipaolo's unjustified allegations, Stan Caterbone borrows her car to go home to his residence in Conestoga and to go play basketball. At approximately 7:00 pm, upon leaving the playground, he is approached by Nancy Arment, FMG, Ltd., secretary, who is elaborated and crying, asking "why are you doing this?". At approximately 9:00 pm, in an attempt to recover additional stolen personal and business tiles, Stan Caterbone proceeds to the offices of FMG, Ltd., where he is greeted by employee Stacy Waters and allowed to enter the building. Stan Caterbone insists that Stacy Walters accompany him throughout the building as he recovers files in the offices of Robert Kauffman, Michael Bartlett, and Robert Long. In addition retrieving a Back-Up (FMG, Ltd, records and communications) copy of the computer system which he integrated. Upon leaving, Stan Caterbone temporarily disconnect the systems which he had integrated and developed for FMG, Ltd., which fall under intellectual property rights. Stacy Walters assists Stan Caterbone in loading the tiles in his automobile, and Stan Caterbone kisses Stacy Walters goodbye, and awaits for her safe return to the building until leaving. Upon entering his residence later that night, Stan Caterbone is taken into custody by the Conestoga Police, and requests that the files that he had taken out of the offices of FMG, Ltd., be taken along to prove his rights to the property, and his position within the company. Stan Caterbone was then taken to the jurisdiction of Manheim Township Police, where he is arrested and taken into custody.September 4, 1987 - At approximately 2:00 am, Stan Caterbone is arraigned before District Justice Richard R. Reeser for the following charges: Terroristic threats; burglary; unlawful restraint; unlawful use of computers; theft by unlawful taking; robbery; and criminal mischief. Bail is set at $20,000 and Stan Caterbone is placed in The Lancaster county prison. He was not permitted to post real estate for bail.September 5, 1987 - The Lancaster New Era and the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal report the alleged crimes, reporting that Stan Caterbone is an ax-employee; that FMG, Ltd., sustained $60,000 because of his actions; and that he threatened 2 female employees. The entire arrests and reports fail to acknowledge that Stan Caterbone is an individual lessee of the property, and in accordance with law, still holds all of his offices of PING, Ltd., and is the founder of the company. The above incident further facilitates the ongoing conspiracy, and publicly discredits Stan Caterbone in every way, financially, professionally, and most importantly conveniently supports the continued allegations of insanity.September 9, 1987 - Stan Caterbone is given an ultimatum by the Lancaster county prison authorities, Robert Bayer, Yolanda Caterbone, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo of posting the required bail only if Stan Caterbone voluntarily admits himself into the Psychiatric Unit of St. Joseph Hospital, or remain in the Lancaster County prison. Stan Caterbone is released from Lancaster County prison, and immediately escorted to St. Joseph Hospital and admitted into the Psychiatric Unit.September 15, 1987 - Stan Caterbone questions the legality of the ultimatum for posting tail, and upon learning that it is unlawful, arranges for his discharge - Upon his discharge, the St. Joseph Hospital administrators learn that FMG, Ltd., had terminated his health insurance, and demand payment of $3, 064.60 for the six days of hospitalization. Stan Caterbone is not able to pay, and leaves the hospital and returns to his residence of Conestoga, PA.September 15, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives an invoice from St. Joseph Hospital for $3,064.00.September 16, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives a call from Howard Eisler, an Investigator for the Pennsylvania Securities Commission who requests a meeting with Stan Caterbone. A meeting is scheduled for September 29, and Stan Caterbone arranges for Robert Beyer and Millard Johnson to attend. |